The sprint is over. The report is already written.

At the end of a sprint someone has to reconstruct what was done, what slipped and what changes for the people using the product. The agent works it out from tickets, commits and pull requests, and prepares a report and release notes that the team rereads before publishing.

For
development teams, software houses, SaaS products
Used by
project managers, product owners, tech leads
Connects to
Jira, Linear, GitHub, GitLab

The problem

A sprint's work is written in three different places: tickets, commits, pull requests. To tell it to someone who was not at the stand-ups, to a client or to management, someone has to put the pieces back together, and loses half a day every two weeks doing it.

Release notes are even worse, because they have to be written for the people who use the product, not for those who built it. So they come out late, too technical or not at all, and users discover new features by chance.

How the data flows

  1. Where it comes from: Tickets (Jira or Linear); Commits and pull requests (GitHub or GitLab).
  2. What happens, Agent: Gathers the sprint (closed, postponed, comments); AI, Writes the report (done, slipped, risks); AI, Rewrites for users (features, improvements, fixes).
  3. Who checks: The team (rereads and corrects).
  4. Where it ends up: Sprint report (for management and clients); Release notes (published with the version).
  5. corrections align the tone.
Steps marked AI are the model's. The rest is ordinary automation or people.

How we solve it

04
01

It reads where the work is already written

Closed and postponed tickets, commits, pull requests, descriptions and comments. Nobody has to fill in anything extra.

02

A report for the people who decide

What was completed, what slipped and why, the risks that emerged, where things stand against the sprint goals. One page, not the list of tickets.

03

Release notes for the people who use the product

The same changes told from the user's point of view, grouped into new features, improvements and fixes. Internal details stay out.

04

Reread before they go out

They arrive as a draft in the team channel or the repository, get corrected and get published. The tone aligns with the examples the team approves.

What we measure

03

These are the numbers we set in discovery, before writing any code. The starting value is measured on your data, and the prototype is judged against it.

Hours to close the sprint

The time spent preparing reports and release notes, before and after.

Release notes published

How many versions ship with their notes, and how long after the release.

Edits before publishing

How much the draft gets changed. If edits drop over time, the drafts are finding the right tone.

When it is not worth it

If tickets and commits are written in a hurry (“fix”, “misc”), the report cannot tell what nobody wrote down. That is usually the first thing to change: the team writes better tickets once it knows someone reads them.

Services involved

Other use cases

11 scenarios
10 · LLM integration

User behaviour

Application logs and databases already show how people use them, but nobody has time to read them. AI reads them, writes a report and suggests what to improve.

11 · AI-first MVP

AI product from scratch

An idea with AI at its core, a market to validate and no technical team. A real product in a few weeks, with real users, built to be able to change.

Tell us the process. We will tell you if it makes sense.

A free 30-minute call, with no commercial follow-up unless you want it.

Request a call

Companies that have already worked with us

  • Velux
  • ISU
  • MovePay
  • AB Group
  • Archiva Group
  • Onda SpA
  • PDE
  • Bynary System
  • COOPI
  • Gimasi
  • Creactives SpA
  • Rev AI
  • Odditt Inc.
  • Si Sociale
  • Stones
  • Turboden
  • Schindler